..."
Ukraine spent several years preparing a 300,000 army to take Donbass in a 1-2 day blitz, and Ukrainian army groups were deployed across Kharkiv and Kyiv areas in preparation for "active defense" knowing Russia would respond aggressively to a massive assault on the Donbass region.
>The operation was planned, taught, and supplied by western governments.
>And the countless trips of western politicians to Moscow prior to the war were intended to slow down Moscow's preparations for a counter-offensive. None of those political visits contained any clear talking points, they were just there to win time.
>Russia knew about the Donbass preparations years in advance, and constructed a pre-emptive war plan, to wage war with the benefit of having the initiative, instead of waging a reactionary war.
>Knowing that breaking through NATO-designed defenses the conventional way wouldn't work, Russia instead used the tactic of "mobile groups" whose primary goal was to "rush B" bypassing fortified Ukrainian defensive lines, and abandoning any military vehicles that malfunctioned or ran out of fuel along the way, since speed was more important than size.
>The "rush B" units had to quickly take control of vital Ukrainian supply and command "nodes" behind enemy lines to make Ukraine's tactics for "active defense" unfeasible, forcing Ukrainian units to redirect their attention inwards into their own territory instead of facing a Russian advance.
>These RU "mobile groups" were essentially Kamikaze units with a high likelihood of being destroyed within days, given that they dispersed themselves deep into enemy territory in small numbers.
>This is why Russia's largest causalities happened during the first days of war, and why the MSM was talking about Russia running out of fuel and supplies on the 3rd day of war. They mistook the "rush B" units for Russia's primary advancing forces.
>Russia has no intention of taking Kyiv. But it has every intention to harass Kyiv to divert attention.
...
...
...
I can see that. Russia only needs the port city and a few other eat ukraine cities to setup a nato buffer. So technically they already won.
...
...
...
Yes I agree OP, the Russians tactics they used in Syria are being applied now in Ukraine , encircle and then cook the enemy. The Russians have left all civilian infrastructure intact, water, electric, gas, Internet all working fine. No need for them to enter the cities as most major Ukrainian military infrastructure was located on the outskirts of the cities. Russia has played this well, with the minimum amount of civilian casualties! Well done Russia!
...
...
...
Don't think they where Kamikaze. Russia showed they can hit any part of Ukraine. Know where mercenaries are and probably monitoring the flow of weapons into Ukraine. You cant trust MSM its still propaganda. Everything the west "knows" is BS.
...
...
...
That’s the goal of it, Putin want Russians to live there when the war is over. Ukraine pigs take advantage of it by hiding in schools, kindergarten and hospital buildings.
Russian army were also told to stay away from agriculture fields.
...
...
...
Ukrainian government is at a safe place somewhere in Europe. It is completely under foreign control and won't be surrendering until the last Ukrainian dies. It doesn't care about its people. Back in WW2, the whole Europe surrendered to Hitler so that he wouldn't destroy its cities. But this government doesn't care at all for obvious reasons.
"...
/pol/ - Unpopular opinion - Politically Incorrect - 4chan | https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/368701582
His truth is marching on.
p.s.:
Ep 2732b – What Happens When A Blockade (Threat) Is Dismantled & Removed, Fire At Will Commander | https://x22report.com/aiovg_videos/ep-2732b-what-happens-when-a-blockade-threat-is-dismantled-removed-fire-at-will-commander/
